Yes, but how?

View of Earth, taken in 1972 by the Apollo 17 crew. This image is the only photograph of its kind to date, showing a fully sunlit hemisphere of the Earth. The planet cannot expand to accommodate growing populations endlessly.

Just had a conversation with someone today who is voting Green. I remembered having read somewhere about that green thinking helped Hitler a lot along the way but could not proof it. So I put a search into the search engine and found this article called “Green Nazis”.
It sums it up very good and explains the basis of Hitler’s mass popularity who rose up on scientific facts.

I ask myself can we avoid something similar today and I think it is going to be difficult.

The basis of Hitler’s rise is based on poverty and a combination of space paranoia. Yet it is only white people who are subjected to that type of thinking. Looking at the overcrowded trains etc in Asian countries, there is no chance of them turning on each other because they have a fear of natural death, something that is not the case in civilised western countries.

For poor people the need to breed over the odds is essential because hunger, disease and natural catastrophe like draught, floods, volcano explosions and earthquake can diminish human populations dramatically. Even in the western world child rich families used to be the norm because there were no medications to stems bubonic plague (black death) for example.

Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini during Hitler's visit to Venice from 14–16 June 1934. Hitler got the crowd into order with military alignment and uniformity

With the invention of medications came the de-naturalisation of humanity. The natural instincts got suppressed and replaced by the everlasting human kindness syndrome that predominates human thinking still today.

Many people adore animals at the expense of fellow human beings, maybe also because animals don’t live that long and one can look down onto something whilst all other humans live longer than other humans.

I think the less we admit the true basis of our human fears the less will we be able to combat Nazism self-destruction of our human societies. Because in the end Hitler ideology led to the self-destruction not only of Hitler’s men, who even poisoned their own children, when they realised they could not win the war, but also almost to the whole Arian race, Hitler so much admired.

In the end people like imperfections because they can look down on something, someone who is not so perfect and needs help. Humans cannot exist if they were all perfect, as it is not in the nature of the species to be like this, there are always weaker and stronger humans, the act of caring is a major stimulant in human development and social structure.

An American soldier stands near a wagon piled high with corpses outside the crematorium in the newly liberated Buchenwald concentration camp. Hitler created an undergroup of those he did not want to bring into the same order and killed them off as surplus to his sense of order.

Hitler himself must have had a major genetic fault to have developed the way he was. He had no children, he had a weird sex live, e.g. is stipulated to have liked urinating on others, or have others urinate on him and so had no urge to reproduce and his own inability to feel broody may have led him to lead Germany into a downfall. 

to the other comparisons in the “Green Nazi article. I am scared about that too because I often speak fondly of my relatives organic farming and how German ideology used this ideal of natural health to help Hitler’s rise and so wonder how we can avoid to fall into the same trap once again.

In a way, when we watch animals, we see the strong kill the weak whilst we humans want to help the weak but in Hitler’s world humans acted like animals and the natural way of live was admired by Nazis.

We would not see it in the animal world that one animal would admire another species and become destructive against themselves but we see this happen in human society. We see people admire the cute cat, the lovely puppy, but hate other humans.


Much attention has been given to preserving the natural characteristics of Hopetoun Falls, Australia, while allowing ample access for visitors. Organising parts of humanity whilst destroying some humans allows preservation of wild nature in Hitler's view.

What really led us humans into the ways of beating nature and healing illnesses with the help of medications is that some privileged members of human society wanted to allow their loved ones to live longer than nature intended and that model catched on widely and now we all use it and must use it because either we combat some illness collectively or we all are in danger of succumbing to it.

Collective solutions are enforced upon us the more crowded we live. We collectively endanger all of us because we are now all dependant on modern technology and modern medicine and we need to find a solution collectively as we are in danger to eradicate ourselves because once human civilisation breaks down it leads to the downfall of it all and will probably lead to only a small minority of humans to survive a global onslaught of hate that would follow a widespread breakdown of today’s civilisation.

This would most likely lead to a worldwide self-extinction by using nuclear weapons.

Chain reactions would set in and become unstoppable by normal methods. One could see how attempts to rid Germany of Hitler failed miserably because each human group makes it its utmost priority to protect the leader, just as ants protect their queen. Strangely enough this type of human dictatorship, the fascist model does not require from the leader to have physical strength but only requires an eradication of individualism.

We are on the way there, that today there is hardly any individuality left anywhere, we all have to fit in somewhere and follow the leader or we are automatically a security risk for those protecting the leader of any sort. This protective mechanism changes from national group to national group, whereby sometimes national group amalgamate into bigger associations.

This gets worst the bigger our population numbers become and there is no way out unless we eradicate large numbers of people to make space to enable individual development of independent smaller groups, which would be going backwards in time.

Hence humans try to break out of the mould and seek other planets to escape to.

Failing to find an escape route to other planets, we should try and reduce population numbers in a civilised fashion and keep them at a steady rate to avoid human catastrophes and turning of one population group against another to resolve the crises humanity is steering towards.

Organic cultivation of mixed vegetables in Capay, California. Note the hedgerow in the background. Organic farming is the return to natural farming methods used in the 19th and 20 century before the population explosion.

Humanity has to make do with the space available to us and that would need careful family planning.

Would it be good to solve a collective problem with a collective solution, the author of the Green Nazi article doesn’t think so.  I don’t think one can dismiss a collective solution as long as it is not one collective against another collective, which would lead to a war.

We cannot turn back the clock and suddenly snap out of our civilised society and suddenly return to organic living to include basic instinct killing of one another. Neither should we seek collective solutions that eradicate individualism and entrepreneurship. Unfortunately for us, humans usually only realise their errors when it is almost too late. that is because we are a follow the leader type of species. We cannot agree to allow views that contradict current leadership thinking and that is a phenomenon we should look into and urgently please. Hitler rose with National Socialism, the word says it all, a nationwide follow the leader ideology that all shared.

Today’s fashion into organic produce is a dangerous one because we could not possibly produce enough food organically to feed all. Simultaneously we get the drive for crops for fuel that would require space for farming those crops by either deforestation or using food crops fields.

Another danger is oncoming earth warming and a reduction of living space as coastal areas, in which 65% of all humans reside will be gone, that has an impact on farming, housing and forestation.

Next of course comes the uniformity. Uniforms in themselves are seen as a good thing and the common belief is that everyone wearing a uniform is a good person and all others are more or less unreliable. but the selective criteria to get into a uniform is very selective even here in anti-fascist Britain, e.g. no bad eyesight, deformities, despite there being a law against disability discrimination.

The whole flavour of the celebrity culture is one of physical fitness, good looks and perfection, very similar to Nazi ideals. It is very important that you check what this link here says. It is however understandable that we need a good pool of physically fit people to sustain those who are not or even just to sustain themselves.

And of course the fatal attraction that the Labour Party provides who say they are ethnic friendly, attract ethnic minorities into Britain, create an overcrowding that is likely to lead to a right-wing backlash. A self-defeating project really. In the end each and every one of us is really just interested in surviving and living with secondary thoughts of others. Or we can only be as tolerant as we can possibly be without endangering ourselves.

People should carefully choose whom they vote for and the best choice in my view is Conservative with the biggest anti-fascist recommendation because they actually were at the forefront of fighting Hitler.

The only way to avoid a repetition of the Hitler tragedy is to enforce strictly all laws condemning crime and especially murder. The action of the Labour Party that invaded Iraq on the back of a terrorist incident, satisfied many but left the bitter taste of bitter revenge on many people’s conscience. Interestingly most Muslims still vote Labour despite being victim of their invading aggression. And it is very dangerous to belief Labour lies who put BNP and the Conservative Party into the same bracket because it were the Conservatives who fought Hitler whilst the BNP admired Hitler.

We cannot assume that all decisions being taken by individuals or groups who say they do it for the common good really are for the common good. Decisions may be of a nihilistic or self-destructive nature, as the Hitler decisions were. We must avoid falling into the same traps as people did in pre-war and Nazi Germany and that is a complicated undertaking.

Comments are closed.

Blog Stats

  • 53,624 hits