Back to reality

81345181-1905040104+-+London+Regional+Summer+Championships+2019

Johanna Kaschke a judge at London Swimming Regional Champs

Just decided to air this blog again, after I had been hiding it for years because of the shame of losing this libel trial. But history is what it is and we just have to live with it. Apparently we are now being defined by our online history and seeing that employers now choose employees by their public profile, I can well now understand that it is absolutely hopeless for me to ever get a well paid job.

What has happened so far?

I am a pensior now and I volunteer a lot to keep busy. I volunteer with

  • my local community centre
  • my local Safer Neighbourhood team and Neighbourhood Watch
  • for British Swimming at competitions as a swimming judge/starter

I am not active in politics at all. It is just amazing how small local activities of a female to do with political parties or interest groups get blown out of all proportions. Does it have to do with power-sharing?

Just having watched Dragon’s Den this week, there is now an online business that offers to clean up people’s public internet profile for a yearly membership of £70, so that it is easier to get the well paid job.

I think I will pass on that and allow the people who so completely and utterly bullied me online to live with their own conscience.

In the meantime, after having left the Conservative Party and been politically abstinent for years, I tried to re-join the Labour Party but was refused membership by my local association apparently just a year after I applied, apparently when I posted a picture of  being at a Jewish synagoge durinng a multi-faith celebration of the yearly Holocaust commemoration, which also included Councillor Islam for Bethnal Green. I declined an inviation to appeal the refusal.

Somehow I have the feeling I just don’t fit into political parties and will give that a miss in future.

 

Advertisements

Miliband sees my point on publishing

Labour has now experienced first-hand how publishers character assassinations can ruin someone’s public profile completely. Reason, political tendencies are being created by denouncing a person’s character using political rhetoric. BBC has produced several articles about this, see one link here. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-24361040

However it was Labour’s own strategy to use those denunciations whilst Brown and McBride worked together. Indeed David Osler, John Gray and others, used the tactics to smear me publicly and I lost a libel case due to the fact that high-profile publisher Iain Dale, started to collect funds and several friends of the defendants used a Conservative lawyer to produce mostly falsified evidence in court. The court was of course only too glad to accept the evidence because it helped to protect the British flagship publisher Der Spiegel.

But one of the defendant’s ally, namely Iain Dale is already falling victim to his own bad character. He recently assaulted a peaceful protester and got a caution. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-24285711

Important curb on Human Rights

That you are now getting your Jobseekers Benefit suspended, for further investigations, if you do any type of unpaid, voluntary work in your spare time, is an important breach into the Right to a Private and Family Life.

Especially Neighbourhood Watch is an organisation that forms from residents within a local area who simply want to protect themselves from crime and help the vulnerable neighbours.

That people are now not allowed to go to meetings with local friends and that such activity infringes a right to Jobseekers Allowance is an unlawful breach of an Important Human Right.

Unfortunately I have no energy, money, nor do I get any legal assistance to fight them. But if anybody is interested looking into this it would be good.

At the moment I am scared to go to meetings with neighbours because the DWP is investigating my activities and I have made a claim for Jobseekers Allowance on 15 April 2013 and that is now frozen till 18 June 2013, so that an investigation into the way I spend my time can be carried out.

I apply for about 3 jobs per day, have been to a job interview when asked to, so the DWP cannot accuse me of not following the rules on Unemployment benefit, but regardless they breach all rules just to get permission to snoop into people’s private lives that way.

Previously the DWP only suspended your benefits if you did unpaid voluntary work and refused the work through the Work Program, but I have not even been put on the work program and they already suspend my benefits for going to meetings with neighbours in my spare time for the purpose to prevent crime and anti-social behaviour in my area. Neighbourhood Watch works closely with the local police but DWP doesn’t like this.

My whole family now gets terrorised by the DWP, family members get called to their office and threatened with legal action for no reason. Other family members get DWP letters on their birthdays to announce benefit changes. It is quite obvious that we are being stalked by DWP.  Important decisions always fall on birthday dates of family members.

I have not been accused of any law breaches at all, but simply the fact that I am unemployed gives the government the right to suspend my benefits if I go out of my house and do other things than shopping or looking for work.

The treatment we get is worst than being given a curfew or restricted rights via a court order. The DWP just takes over our whole lives.

What also gives them the right to investigate every corner of your life is the fact that you give a data sharing consent as Neighbourhood Watch coordinator. Therefore I withdrew all data sharing consent I gave to Met Police because the combination of Met Police data sharing consent and DWP investigations just about ruins people’s lives.

I hae also been informed by the Chair of the London Association that Human Rights Laws do not apply to Volunteers. So another reason not to volunteer.

I won my appeal against DWP

I am always better on paper than in person. I thought previously the judges were put off by me. But on this occasion HM Courts and Tribunal Service found in my favour because the DWP wanted to stop my Jobseekers Allowance because they said I did not actively seek work in the 2 weeks when I organised the Queen’s Jubilee Party.

Victory of Common Sense for all volunteers on Jobseekers Allowance.

Added later. The judge ruled: “The appeal is allowed.The decision made on 18.06.12 is set aside. Having considered all of the evidence the tribunal determined that Ms Kaschke was actively seeking employment from 30.05.12 to 12.06.12. Accordingly she is entitled to Jobseekers Allowance over the period……..”Also the judge remarked that “The Tribunal reached a different conclusion on substantially the same facts”.

That is also a factor in so many appeals being won in cases involving disability. There at least 40% of appeals are won and of those 40% 1/3 present no new evidence.Margaret Hodge says that the fault lies firmly within the DWP. My sentiment entirely, as I previously mentioned about Iain Duncan Smith.

I am not disabled but find that there is some tuning necessary between policy and facts in Jobseekers procedures. Job Advisors are very trigger happy and routinely threaten claimants with legal action against them, just in case and to be intimidating.

But also look at the amount of time that has elapsed between the wrong decision being made and the appeal being allowed by the tribunal; that makes 7 months of stress and is also a waste of time and tax payer’s money; though at least a good judge got a job.

The age of the new fascism

What I really again wanted to say is how disappointed I am with the news reporting and also with the news reporting on the BBC website in that it is not inventive analytical enough. Politics evolve and repression can take various shapes and forms and what websites like the BBC again and again put into our heads is that repression and fascism has to do with direct annihilation and putting to death of people by governments like during Hitler times or Pol Pot for example.

Yet what we see today is a new type of fascism, a fascism by stealth.

What we see is that the new Conservatives try to get rid of our economy altogether by slowly throttling it. They mask it all up saying they need to clear our debts. But, as I already hinted in my last post, our economy is based on the creation of debt and if enough debt has been created in the form of orders to industry for example, when consumers borrow to order goods, they then need to be made and people get employed to make those goods.

When the Conservatives now say they want to get rid of debt, they simply throttle the whole economy because nothing will move forward. This then leads to a situation whereby the people who are living within a society slowly but surely are starting to turn against each other and one sees an increase in murders and crime. People become more disillusioned and turn onto open revolt, as we have seen it during the riots and as we now see it happening in Syria.

Here in the UK we managed to stop the riots but in Syria they are not so lucky.

But what I find most interesting is that Cameron now seeks to introduce an economic model that seem s to match the one Hans-Martin Schleyer tried to introduce into Germany in the late 70s, just before he gotten himself kidnapped and killed. The Germans then blamed everything on the Baader-Meinhof group and that is also very simplistic of them to do so. Luckily for the local situations, the Muslims here in the UK exercise a lot of restraint and stop themselves from falling into the chief-suspect category for anything that goes wrong.

It had been said that during the beginning of the Hitler era, he staged self-made terror events, to propel himself into power and I think that the whole Baader-Meinhof phenomenon was abused in Germany to drive through changes and to blame all sorts of crime onto this illusive Baader-Meinhof group, who were said to work for the Communists. But that doesn’t make much sense in many respects. Because what Schleyer tried to achieve was in fact a turning away from classic Capitalism into Socialist Cooperative movements, which would have complemented the East German Communist regime beautifully. Now why would a Communist state finance terrorist to kill somebody who wanted to promote Socialism in a Capitalist state?  I belief that the East German files that were “found” where plainly planted to disorienting us. It was so very convenient for the German government that a lot of those Baader-Meinhof terrorists gotten killed or supposedly killed themselves in prison and that no proper witness statements from them came ever into being.

I think in Germany a lot of crime was blatantly blamed onto Baader-Meinhof when in fact it could have been some coup from some other direction. It was more than obvious that the Germans still tried to promote the Baader-Meinhof phenomenon as recently as 5 years ago by entering a film about them to win an Oscar. Der Spiegel offered me thousands to get the copyright on an article, using my name to falsify history and I refused it. It is more than suspicious that a large magazine knowingly wants to print falsities and pay people to put their names to the falsities.

Today the government does have a problem, they have no terrorist movement in the UK to blame crimes on, thanks to the good restraint of our Muslim citizens, there is hardly any terrorist activity going on at the moment, that the government could blame crime on.

This government simply slowly wants to throttle us, they try it with the Greeks and that is the tactic to simply starve people out of live slowly but surely. There is little sense in currently used tactics other than making people’s life a misery, needlessly I need to say. There is no proper purpose in the current government tactics, they do not even want to promote green living and environmental health, they simply just try to starve us out of our existence.

We must repel this new trend to rob us of our livelihoods, to rob us of our right to celebrate God. I think the denial of God and fascism always goes hand in hand no matter what face this fascism shows, whether they openly kill people or slowly throttle them or whether they make them turn onto each other, they always deny God and that is truly the work of the devil. You could ask the question is secularism equal to Satanism and that is an interesting question instead. But the fact is that this government wants to stop families from having children and that is a crime on humanity.

We keep on lamenting how bad things are in China, we complain about the Human Rights abuses, that priest are not allowed to preach, that people are forced to kill babies because of the one child policy, yet we do exactly the same here in the UK, we just don’t see it because it is right in front of our own door.

Justice Eady, the truth is still waiting

I have now suffered several, in my view botched judgements that I had to endure simply because in civil law I am not entitled to legal representation. The case involves an originally British publisher, Der Spiegel and an employee of a Spiegel subsidiary, Lloyds List, which now bought into Der Spiegel. Mr Osler is extremely left-wing and supports all sorts of left-wing groups from Anarchists to Communists. He works in Lloyds list especially on the pirate issue, e.g. Somalis hijacking British ships. Of course several British women have become victims of Somali terrorist activity recently.

Justice Eady found for Der Spiegel, found for Mr Osler and found for all the other defendants involved in the UK left-wing Labour movement. They were spurred on by a member of the Conservative Party who volunteered, without being forced to in any way, to defend Mr Osler, whose defence then benefitted the other attached defendants. British law was so pleased with the performance of Mr Dougans that he became Assistant Solicitor of the Year, that is how the British reward those who work in the best interst of their country. Mr Hilton of course was supported by the big and rich Gay Support Network as he is an admitted and known Homosexual. But still all the Britishness and Gayness doesn’t allow a court to find wrongly on the evidence.

So, yes I am a German immigrant, now in possession of a British passport and I dared to attack the former Axel Springer empire over one of their publications. Of course one needs to know that Springer was implanted on Germany after World War II to dismantle the Hitler propaganda machine.

Why was I picked on by Springer? It is not known.  Tthe reason why I was arrested can be seen from these documents here, which are from the German Prosecutor from the 70s and 80s. There are 3 documents, all of which are translated. It is more than clear from the documents that I was arrested in line with an investigation against a Wilhelm Boenninger whom I do not know and who, according to my research, is never named in connection with any Baader-Meinhof activities anywhere on the net. There are a vast number of Internet pages, which list known BM or RAF associates. That name is not there, neither is mine. I never met a man called Wilhelm Boenninger and assume it is a case of mistaken identity. See letter from 12 March 1980, Ref 8 Js 500/75. I then was compensated for false arrest and the false imprisonment suffered See letter from 16 March 1978, ref 4StR Es 158/77. Also enclosed and then I received a letter from the German authorities certifying that I was never, not even remotely under suspicion of RAF association. See the underlined word on the bottom of page 1, letter dated 10 April 1980 Ref 1BJs 93/77.

Yet Mr Justice Eady felt fit to belief the palaver of Mr Osler, who argued that all arrests in the 70s in Germany must have to do with the Baader-Meinhof Group. The British publication machinery, including the BBC spread rumours that in Germany up to 35% of the population were in active support of the Baader-Meinhof group, which is a statistic that is very hard to belief. It is false and mere rubbish. You must imagine that if 35% of the population were in support of something then every 3rd or 4th person you would meet in the street would be involved into a criminal gang and actively supporting them. That is practically unthinkable and cannot be supported in any rational argument.  Apparently there is no broadly conducted survey that could support such a statistic, a survey that would have been conducted in Germany itself, asking ordinary German citizens and not just the demonstrating student minority that is so readily portrait on UK websites.

It simply pleases the British mentality to think that the Germans were broadly in support of Baader-Meinhof but that is the reason for Justice Eady’s judgment against me. The fact is that not anywhere in any official paperwork available from 1975 – 1980, not anywhere is there any mention of any political orientation. There is no way that anybody could come along and reasonably argue that any arrest that took place in Germany in the 70s, must have taken place because of Baader-Meinhof activities. Especially also not as at that time Germany did not know a Terrorism clause within Criminal law. A terrorism clause was added in late 1976. It was Der Spiegel that couched my arrest in an article about Baader-Meinhof and Eady J cleared Der Spiegel of publication  in the UK  during my case against Der Spiegel when later he accepted doctored evidence from Osler that it had been published. This is an obvious miscarriage of justice.

Osler seems to be the babe of the court. He works for Lloyds List the subsidiary of Der Spiegel and in particular mostly on the Somali Pirate issues. Several women were kidnapped by Somali pirates recently. Judith Tebbutt, a disabled women, was snatched, her wheelchair left behind, her husband murdered.

The Paragraph 129 as it was in use then was so wide, that anybody would be arrested within it, including Travellers, religious sects like the The Church of Scientology and all would be accused of potentially wanting to throw over the German state and be potential terrorists, there was no actual proof needed for such an accusation. That was the climate under which arrests took place in Germany in 1975. It would be unthinkable today that this could happen with the Human Rights Act in place. It was plain and simply state persecution that allowed the imprisonment of indiscriminate amounts of people so that the state could weed out undesirables and collect information from people. Thousands fell victim to this.

There is no way, that I was ever assumed to be in touch with the RAF or Baader-Meinhof, there is no proof that the state even sought it was possible. The letters proof it, one even says, that I was never, not even remotely under such suspicion.

Not only did Eady J support the dismissal of my case because he thought it was an abuse of process because the difference between a compensated criminal arrest and compensated Baader-Meinhof arrest is too small, he actively supported in his judgement the notion that my arrest must have been for left-wing activities, for which there is no proof available at all. Not in any letter from the German authorities is this actually supported. I protested about this rigorously during the draft-judgement state but Justice Eady knows that without that left-wing element, his judgement cannot stand, and so he put it in just to make it work.

Justice Eady decided to please Der Spiegel, to please the left-wing Lloyds List employee. Why? Probably its a racist and sexist motivated judgement, that might also have religious grounds. What the British have established to be an anti Hitler propaganda tool, has turned into a pro-British propaganda tool and bends facts to please the British instead. Mr Osler later posted on Mr Gray’s blog, that I was defeated just like the Germans in World War II and the police promptly allocated a crime number for that posting but refrains to prosecute because the fine they could achieve would not exceed £50.

Of course I think sexism plays a big role. I am a single women, not associated with the typically important English male or even female (that if I was a Lesbian, which I am not). Many nasty posts have been produced during the course of the court case, mainly from men with revolting comments, that even one female high court judge remarked upon and then Mr Osler dropped his claim for costs. Unfortunately distasteful sexual comments were all over the Internet on this case.

Unfortunately for me, the whole justice system in Europe is now so impenetrable, that the single judges in the European Court of Human Rights also just tick off applications by unrepresented applicants as not being admissible, like they do in 95% of the cases. They cherry pick cases to hear and mine was not there.

The truth on my cases is still outstanding and I feel I am a victim of a miscarriage of justice.  It is my opinion and I have Freedom of Expression.

One recent reader comments that the court must have been listening to the case for so long to cash in on the payments from the state, which covered the costs for my applications because they need the money. That does not please the British Tax Payer.

I still belief and think I am correct in doing so, that there is a considerable difference in a general arrest and an arrest with specific suspicions of supporting and sympathising with a mayor terrorist group, who solely work from an illegal underground network. That is what the posts implied. Even in Germany the authorities did put such specific accusations in their arrest warrants, but not in mine, which was jointly with one other person, who also never was associated with known terrorists. I am glad to have been cleared of BM involvement, even with the British judgements, yet I was still made to loose the cases.

I shall add links to this shortly and further docs to download as proof

Hi, it is back on

You may have noticed that I took my blog off for a little while because I gotten threatening letters again from the lawyer because of my lost libel cases. Suddenly they remembered that I still owe them money. But having read an article last night to which I was alerted from a Facebook Friend, I think the legal action against me now has to be seen in a historic light. Please read the new page about the Rothchilds and I put that indirectly in the legal context of my cases. In such a way, that I wondered why the court found it so important to defend the Freedom of Speech of people who report wrongly and who work for a mainstream publisher. I wondered why one of the most prominent judges found it important to issue judgements that still falsify the context of my case. Because I was never arrested for left-wing activities, there is not a shred of proof for that assumption in Mr Justice Eady’s judgement.

I have provided many original German documents and none of them put me in any left-wing context.

I wondered why a Conservative Lawyer works for free to defend a left-wing radical and there is the connection, it is the bigger picture that is being defended here. Read on my new page who owns all the mayor publishing houses that tell us what to think day after day and make conclusions about the importance of Left-wing and Right-wing politics and politics in general. If you read the new page you will see that politics is merely a smoke screen that hides the more important factors away from us and is merely intended to keep us busy so that we do not think about the real facts that are important. Of course it is now also quite obvious that the ECHR only takes on cases that suit their political power-play and refuse all others including mine.

What is important now is to prevent any political or other upheavals that could disturb our quality of life. Prevent any future political movements that could bring harm to our population or criminal activities that disturb our peace. Because we little people are sick of suffering for the benefit of some powerful players.

I am a Londoner Mr Gray

Having read the latest post of Mr Gray about me, my mind immediately began to spin. I think it happens to all of us, that if we read something our minds start associations both emotional, intellectual and irrational. With that post of Mr Gray my mind started to get unfortunately and worrying irrational thoughts, which I am hoping others do not get too. It is most regrettable that Mr Gray should have chosen to portray the most unfortunate rock band in the history of Britain to express his delight of his win before the High Court. We all know that the particular member of the Sex pistols ended up stabbing his own girl friend and then killed himself or died a drugs-related death. How unconstructive that dialogue is that Mr Gray opened there. He describes the video as video recording of the defendant Osler at the Royal Courts of Justice.

I am disturbed about this element of death and wonder what is going on in Mr Gray’s mind.

Of course it is never easy to deal with the loss of not one but several civil court proceedings as I have to do but glee is not the best way to deal with it, even not as the winner of the proceedings, at least that is my view.

Probably the court did think it necessary to discuss that matter through thoroughly and I went all the way along with it and in the end, even though I lost, the court was not very harsh and encouraged the defendants to enforce the costs strictly against me but built me a few bridges in recommending that the defendants don’t do anything to get their money because there is no point in doing so.

However since Mr Gray introduced the self-destructive element into the discussion by using Sid Vicious as his spokes-man, and that’s why I am getting slightly worried and start to think about John F Kennedy who came to Berlin saying, Ich bin a Berliner and he ended up getting murdered by some mad-man. Just as I came to London and I am feeling as  Londoner but hope that I do not suffer the same fate as Mr Kennedy.

I do not regret having brought those court cases still and still think they were necessary to clear my name because the court judgements that were handed down had a sober effect on people in that they explained the many questions that were opened by Mr Gray’s original postings and smoothed people’s fears that were aroused through the meanings that could be read between the lines of Mr Gray’s post.

I, have always taken great pride in my status as a Londoner and worked very hard to make my surrounding environment as nice as possible and spent many voluntary hours of doing so. That is well documented in the many letters I have written to the local authority and others to try and stem anti-social behaviour and crime in my area to the extend that I am now chair of the Tower Hamlets Neighbourhood Watch Association and I worked closely with the police and members of the local authority to establish this voluntary body within Tower Hamlets after the council has abolished support for Neighbourhood Watches ca 10 years ago.

I have turned my back on politics because I do not like the bitterness of it, how fierce party members trash each other in trying to get to the top of the pile and get votes and glory. I have never gotten any glory for my voluntary work, the opposite is the case. I have always been severely criticised by people like Mr Gray who have nothing better to do than spread trivialities around themselves and hand out disturbing comments in some respects, like on this occasion using the most unfortunately public figure in British life, like Sid Vicious for his purposes.

Persons like Sid Vicious are the reason why I spend so many hours, days, month, years to combat drug dealing and anti-social behaviour because drug use leads to death and self-destruction. The police knows it, the council knows it and the drug dealers in mya rea know it because I am one of the most prolific anti-drug campaigners in my area. I have gotten a lot of support over the years and think I managed to do some good and all I am trying to achieve is get rid of mental and physical destruction that is the poison of communal happiness.

Of course I have never gotten the glory of being nominated by any party for election, that is because I am not one of those political sheep but have my own way of building relationship and bring communities forward. It is most regrettable that costs have occurred to the tax payer during my libel actions but that has happened in my instances of totally regular government activity that money has been wasted on schemes or money has been spent that probably had some good effect but has not materialised immediately.

I think some judges have openly shown some sympathy because of the grossly tasteless nature of some posts about me and in the end, when an application was made to actually investigate my finances and I was forced to disclose the last 10 years of my personal accounts to the court, on application of Mr Dougans, the court could not find anything wrong with my accounts, which of course is something I am proud of. In fact the vice-president of the Queen’s Bench recommended no action being taken against me to get the costs. The court found that I have been quite responsible with my finances and had not ridden roughshod with my money as so many others do. They dismissed the application to interfere in my financial affairs. Well of course it is always nicer to be rich and successful financially but we all have found out lately, unfortunately that this is not an easy feat.

Well, it is one of those cases, we all seen in the past where officially the law is on one side but emotionally people can understand and sympathise with what is actually going on.

It seems quite odd to me that Mr Gray’s posting coincides with the publication of an article in East End Life, where they announce the meeting of the Tower Hamlets Neighbourhood Watch Association’s public meeting next week, so that Mr Gray now has to time his posting to properly ridicule me again, to make it even more difficult for me to bring the Neighbourhood Watch Association forward. It has been the jest of public policy in Tower Hamlets to get rid of Neighbourhood Watch by supporting it as little as possible. Tower Hamlets is one of the few boroughs in the whole of the UK where the council does not support Neighbourhood Watch. It  is one of my biggest goals in life to re-establish neighbourhood watch. Getting rid of crime has always been my biggest dream in life because I do not like personal destruction, I like to live in a harmonious community and I am sure most of us do like to live in a nice area with nice people.

I am not bitter at all, it is just unfortunate that I did not get more positive official feedback but that is probably just my lot that I am one of those people who tirelessly work for the public good but who never get any tap on the shoulder or public praise, I just end up spending many hours and days and the little bit of money I got, doing voluntary work with often little sleep and all I ever get in public is criticism and ridicule. That just happens to some people but that doesn’t put me of from working for the community because I like to live in peace and I do not like crime and anti-social behaviour and so I do everything possible to achieve a better life for us all.

I think it is also very unfortunate that political squabbling led to this very unfortunate court case and that is another reason why I turned my back on politics because if we are all honest, wanting to live in a nice neighbourhood, where we can enjoy ourselves is something we all want regardless of political aims. At least that is what we all should want. It is often political glee and anxiety that leads to character trashing of the other side’s representatives often with very tasteless public exultations.

Now I am starting to think have it your way Mr Gray and with this latest expression of your feelings, I think you made it quite clear to people that you think Britishness is being free to kill your girlfriend and yourself with too much drug use. You are of course free to do that here in the UK. And come to think  of it the public are entitled to know what you really think about life.

One of Mr Gray’s harshest criticism against me was that I left the Labour Party and he idealizes the CCCP young pioneers in his post. I did not know what CCCP meant but when I searched it on the Internet the first search result talked about Hitler youth. But what Mr Gray put on show was his herd mentality, which is something he always held against me, the fact that I do not have it and that little discussion has now surprisingly brought me some support from someone at the BBC who wrote an article about it.

It is deeply worrying how many radical elements Mr Gray has in some of his posts.

I have raised 5 children and now have also 5 grandchildren and I dearly love to give them a good future. Though my lost court cases mean that unfortunately I cannot leave them any money but at least I can try to make sure that they can grow up in a country with as much going for them as they can achieve through honesty and hard work. That is all that is left to me to do as a German immigrant in Britain today.  Apparently non of my kids ever even looked at drugs, they do not like them, they do not take them and they work and live quite ordinary but respectable lives. It is well known to my local police and the local council how much I was always on the side of the law and how much I care for my environment. I also put considerable amounts of my own money into my voluntary efforts.

I have been getting training as Community Crime Fighter under Gordon Brown who came to the Rich Mix Centre one day to support the scheme but not Neighbourhood Watches who are the central communal crime-fighting force throughout the UK and I will not let it happen that this is being dismantled by the likes of Mr Gray, even though I belief that this is what he really wants to achieve with his actions. He tries to discredit a member of the Neighbourhood Watch movement to ridicule it and make it untenable for people to support it.  Why else would he time his posting to coincide with the first meeting of the Tower Hamlets Neighbourhood Watch Association THNWA, of which I am chair at the moment and I am the most eager driving force behind it and he knows it.

We are all human and there are many who have not 100% status by being rich, famous and successful but there are many ordinary people like myself that are committed to lawfulness. It has been quite seriously established in the last 5 years, that there is nothing I have ever done wrong or against the law and that is really what counts that whatever we do, we have to do it within the law and that was always one of my most important principles, which I intend to keep.  That is what disturbs me about politics these days, is that voters are asked to look for that perfect human being, that has no blemishes in their lives to represent them when we then see them before the courts to find they fiddled their expenses.

Lets all sober up and continue to strive for the best possible life we can get and as long as we all do the best we can I think that is the most we can expect. My voluntary activities include all and I hope that people from all political directions agree with me that wanting to improve our quality of life means that we must repel anti-social behavior and crime and that is something we can all work together on. But of course if people do not want me to work on that goal, then I just have to make do with what I can do, and that is just look after my own family and read books. I shall see.  It is obvious that nobody wants to employ me.

Of course I cannot regret having come to London and become a British citizen because I had my children here and started to built my family. Of cousre had I never come to London I would not have had to suffer the many years of ridicule because of my German origin. But life goes on and I am happy with having gotten my kids and I am concerned about their future. I think most people with children can follow my sentiments.  Does Mr Gray have any children? Does Mr Hilton have any children? No, not to my knowledge. So it seems to put this all into perspective, the radical postings of 2 Labour Party activists who have no personal future to protect beyond their own existence.

The court did find it necessary to thorouughly examine the issues that these cases have brought and if they would have thought it not worth to look at the cases they could have stopped them very quickly if they had wanted but they chose not to do so.

I might add to this posting later on but now have a school-run.

Culture comes with the territory

I was very amused to read about the remarks John Cleese made (according to the Sun) during a recent Australian TV interview. A friend came over to see him from California and he’d ask him: “Well, where are all the English people?” when they walked down Kings Road. Cleese then also added that London is no longer an English City.

The Avengers

When I came to London in 1977 I came with the expectation to see those distinctly English people that I got to learn about from cultural exports like the TV serials I could watch from Germany like the Avengers with an English Diana Rigg and of course the famous gentlemen with the bowler hat and an umbrella. Much of the musical development throughout Europe hinged on those particularly English bands.

Of course any country is not just an empty shell with some geography and areas that get contemporary residents. When I travel to China today, I expect to see Chinese people and not a mixture of all cultures. I would not just go to see the Great Wall of China, I would love to see how the Chinese live. People that travel to Afghanistan certainly expect to see the Afghans there and not a lot of Polish immigrants for example.

I always thought that if you love a particular culture you go to that region in your holidays to visit it and that is what many residents in some countries love, that is the tourist trade. The whole point of tourism however gets lost of the particular cultures of geographic regions cease to exist.

All types of tourists particularly enjoy visiting countries for the folks that live there and not just the architecture. But it appears that London in particular has just become an empty shell of particularly English buildings with a lot of history but the people that built them have moved elsewhere.

What is annoying is that all those politicians who wish to be voted into office, continually openly declare their love for Tower Hamlets for instance, when this is the poorest borough in the country and full of trouble. It seems that all those who can afford to do so have long moved out of London and only those who were brought here as economic migrants remain, making this city the racial mix it is right now.

I would not have come to London had I known that I am going to be living in a hotspot of international cultures because that is not what the cultural exports from Britain promised me to expect. My late husbands favourite actor was among others John Cleese and Fawlty Towers prominent on our TV screen.

I don’t support Boris’s view that we should celebrate diversity and Ken’s view that London has to stay competitive by integrating lots of various cultures into the town. London loses its particular charm the less English it becomes. It’s still the people that make the town and not the town that makes the people.

an era of discontent

New battle lines are drawn in Britain both for political and personal conflicts. The personal conflicts involve the many criminalised rioters who burst out onto Britain’s streets and also the few falsely accused criminal cases like the recent nurse that was accused of poisoning patients and now had to be released after suffering a living hell. A landlord was accused of killing a tenant. It also involves me, when I lost my libel cases after over 3 years through the English courts and no satisfaction at all.

On the communal front we see strikes of police support staff and now demos over NHS changes and racial tension also mounts around the EDL and left-wing anti-demos taking place in London Whitechapel today.

People, including myself simply have lost faith into the legal and political system and people are scared of what is to become of our country. We all want to live in peace and be able to belief in truth, justice and our future but that has become increasingly difficult.

I have lost my faith in the English judiciary to do with the ability to judge a libel issue on the facts and on the laws as they are. I have seen how the judges juggle along and just want to fulfil a policy to push through cases on a whim and do not really examine the evidence before them fairly. Well at the time, when my cases went through the court, the political landscape in Britain was fairly easy. The Left was manageable and there was relatively little open discontent, as it has now spilled onto Britain’s street. But I saw the signs and warning bells rang in my head as I can see and listen to what is said and I could see the discontent brewing underneath and now it has finally spilled out. I think worst is to come in relation to racial tensions.

I would have accepted the loss of my cases if I thought that the court had come to the conclusions they did on a proper basis but I am not satisfied with the decisions the court has made. The many judgements made throughout the cases were highly contradicting. For example in one instance Mr Justice Stadlen remarked how prolix my performance really was and on the other hand Lord Justice Thomas said that I am very articulate and can make the points that any skilled applicant can make.

Altogether in my view, the whole process was not properly carried out and the court followed a legal doctrine to dismiss the case and reasons were found to follow that legal doctrine.

Yet it shows that if a court mangled up all facts to fulfil the aim to decide a case within a legal doctrine that actual evidence and facts remain unsatisfactory.

unfortunately the English court does not seem it necessary to control publications as for correctness and in the very important field of being able to speak freely ones’ grievances, and in the even more important field of terrorism, the courts are not worried whether publishers use actual facts or assumed facts and the English law unfortunately does not need to examine cases properly.

More worryingly still the ECHR does not do their job properly either. There are now single judges that decide whether cases are being allowed and those judges also follow legal doctrines. The ECHR does not even show an interest to police their own guidelines through the English courts. 90% of applications to the ECHR are dismissed for failure to comply with listing regulations. That is more than concerning and shows that the ECHR is unable to deal with a mounting discontent over judicial processes throughout Europe, which should be a huge worry for lawlords. Yet I have not read one article that judges are actually worried about this.

Quite often throughout my case evidences were not properly examined and much time was spent looking at other case-law, which was not relevant to my cases. Evidences from the Defendants was presented, which was quite obviously printed all on the same printer when it was said that it came from several different parties and the court accepted all this without question.

What I am trying to say is that if people get the impression that courts do not account for evidences properly any longer then people get the impression that justice isn’t working any longer and if people cannot rely on justice they tend to spill out into anarchy. I think that every sentenced and imprisoned person somehow agrees to a judgment against them if they can understand and appreciate the reasoning behind the sentence but if those sentenced feel that justice was flawed then they can appeal. and if justice doesn’t allow a fair appeal process then they often enough become violent. I have however no plans to become violent at all and feel that we need to keep it together and make sure that our daily lives go on as peaceful as possible.

Unfortunately in civil cases the law sees little joy in helping those without money and those with money can win cases as long as they can afford an expensive lawyer.

The law sees the importance only on the cases where people can pay costs and that is most likely going to be the downfall of UK civil law. You cannot purchase justice because justice is something that must not be dependant on financial status but if it does depend on financial status then it becomes automatically a corrupt process and unfortunately I have to say that English civil justice has become corrupted.

Regardless of that, I think we all enjoy our lives in peace and serenity, at least as much as possible and the current situation in the UK is of real concern to us all. The overall discontent has now only recently emerged with the establishment of the new government. Yet the disagreements are not very deep I should say. During my legal cases the Conservatives, Labour and Liberals all agreed amongst each other that this case brought by me the German immigrant deserves thorough dismissal. Mr Osler posted on Mr Gray’s blog that the Germans were defeated just as in World War II again. Yet the pleasure the English still have on winning World War II shows how sentimental they really are and still live in the past. But there are changes on the horizon.

The recent concert of an Israeli orchestra was interrupted here in London, which is quite astonishing, considering the UK takes considerable pride in having defended the Jewish race against the Germans in World War II. So there is an important shift in the political agenda to the far right in this current political climate.

There is wide-spread protest on current reform plans and open revolt among young people against this new government. The recent harmony that was reached on the Internet highways over my case has totally disintegrated into open hate against the government, when they thought they could help their way out of unpopularity by helping Labour win the case against me. Well that didn’t last very long and didn’t help the Conservatives push through the ‘reforms’ they wanted to achieve. It however shows how false and two-faced the Conservative Party is when on one hand they took my membership contributions and on the other volunteered a lawyer to defend the political opponents against my case. Prominent Conservative public figures appeared in evidence against me and for the Labour Defendants. The same prominent public figures who loudly voiced sexist remarks especially Guido Fawkes made controversial appearances on behalf of the Taxpayer’s Alliance. In his astonishing disgusting remarks against me, Mr Fawkes received widespread support from a group of anonymous bloggers.

I have decided to re-publish all my posts made during my civil cases because I took them off whilst I applied to have the cases heard before the ECHR who have now refused to look into them because they simply want to play along with the UK on this one. I think it’s a mistake by the ECHR but obviously they care very little what I think. I am perceived as a totally unimportant person and as a woman at that, English and ECHR justice cares little about their own failures to examine their own legislation properly and failure to adhere to their own rules. Whilst I won a hearing before Justice Stadlen over the publication rights of an English blogger, the court failed to examine properly who is actually publishing what and failed to determine the actual technical status and web master’s status of Mr Hilton. It is immensely important to the case that Mr Hilton actually never was the web master of his own blog as it was then and that he only actioned a browser panel as user of the service. That is immensely important under Regulation 19 and the E-commerce regulations. I still belief Justice Stadlen had some wrong interpretations despite finding for me on that one.

To me it just shows how ridiculous the legal process has become when a whole court can sit over 3 years and produce judgment after judgment against 1 single woman and feel good about that without even given me any type of legal support. This shows how little justice cares to be seen to be working in the UK today.

I am not bitter about the outcome of the legal action but do think it reflects the corruption of UK and European Justice today and it is only a very small part of the overall disorganisation and corruption that affects the UK and Europe today. Of course the big corruption affects us all in the shape of the recession we are in today and the constantly ongoing cases against banks. The economy is down and we are also suffering an age of natural disasters. It is important to keep focussed. I do not want any problems because of my own problems with the courts. But I feel if they do not improve their workings they will just drive themselves into the ground and to a halt.

But we have seen the problems that Freedom of Expression has already suffered during the recent riots. That the Prime Minister openly called for the stop of Social Network messaging when people call for riots to take place.

I would say there is an important differentiation to be made. It hinges on the facts.

1. If people are genuinely disaffected and have suffered discrimination, maladministration of justice, poverty, hunger, or other genuine problems, then there is a genuine cause to discuss this openly and that may lead to a common cause for open revolt. That is something no government can stop because if there is a common cause then people will always organise to overthrow a bad regime and even if that takes a long time.

2. But there are always those who wish to instigate revolt by publishing material that is ill-founded and untrue and is aimed to radicalize the few that just wait for a trigger to go over the edge and cause damage to their otherwise peaceful communities. The Baader-Meinhof group is just one example of an ill-founded uprising.

I think that my cases fell into that second category. I still maintain that the publications about me were untrue and I have provided ample evidences to the court about this. The facts I presented to the court were accepted by the court. It is just that the court could not decide that if you accuse somebody of an underlying terrorist association, that this is illegal. I have studied the publications that exist about Germany in the 60s and 70s and some publications, which are also on the BBC website say that in Germany at that time up to 35% of Germans had passive sympathy for the Baader-Meinhof group. I find this unbelievable. That would mean that every 3rd or 4th person you meet in the street supports the activities of that terrorist group. I lived in Germany at that time and never even met people who openly supported their activities or even spoke about them.

Simultaneously we see those reports of students protests that went on in Germany. The fact is those were very isolated incidents and did not widely take place. If you get a demo in one street in one town that does not mean that this actually takes place all over the country.

Compare it to today’s riots in Britain, those riots were much more violent and widespread than any Baader-Meinhof sympathy ever happened in Germany and yet the English publishers would not write that 35% of all people in Britain sympathised with the rioters. Of course the UK publishers do not want to be seen writing about open support for rioters in their own country. They only ever do it about other countries.

It is very unfortunate in my view and will have dire consequences that the publication machinery today simply is out of hand and facts are distorted to please a policy. Even if I now read reports about what happens in Iraq, Syria and especially about the alleged atrocities and human rights abuses under Gaddafi, I often ask myself but where is the evidence to proof that allegation. We are presented with cases that say that such and such people are responsible for the death of so many but where is the proof? We have seen it in Iraq, that publishers or politicians made a case for invasion and that took place despite later evidences saying that there were no weapons of mass-destructions.

Unfortunately the reading public is gullible and fed so much information that has no proper basis whatsoever other than the gruesome facts that are then blamed on the bad person that the media and the politicians have chosen to pursue.

We recently have seen a string of media scandals whereby persons had publicly been vilified by the press and then it emerged that reports were false, sensationalist and ill-founded. Large amounts of compensations had to be paid out and reporters had also been found to intrude in people’s private lives by hacking into their phones. Yet the law has not come to grip with good case-law to stamp down on irresponsible media reporting and  the general public continue to be mislead by the press until it comes to the crunch and we are eventually told that it was all wrong, but in the meantime we have to belief what they tell us.

Publications often disperse as bullying one person or another. In my view this state of affairs reflects on the facts that our economy is down and people lost their way and the diplomatic decency and respect towards each other and is simply a reflection of social disintegration that I hope can be put back into function when the economy picks up again. People who work are usually more content and less prone to become verbally abusive towards each other.

Previous Older Entries

Blog Stats

  • 52,762 hits