Thought control from Mayor Facebook

Having heard that YouTube – owned by Facebook – has shut down the postings of David Icke, a proclaimer of weird theories about the origin of Covid-19, it seems interesting, to say the least, that we now have thought control of the Internet imposed upon us.

Just wonder whether an alpha-male like David Icke will take that laying down. I don’t agree with his opinion, that G5 could be responsible for Corona Virus but it is an opinion, wrong or right. People no longer have the choice to listen to nonsense now.

I noticed that YouTube also deleted one of my videos. It was actually factually correct but not very pretty and filmed in a darkened room. It dealt with the origin of the Freemasons, a subject that was discussed on social media 30 years ago. Not that I am particularly interested in it, but it is noticable that YouTube thought it needs to be removed.

On the matter of enrichment, I thought the more the better. And as long as it doesn’t promote open violence or hate why can’t people say what they think any longer?

Just went shopping the other day and really appreciated that we have so many shops from people of different cultures who all sell basically the same stuff but sell it for their own communities from different outlets.

Trading standards could come along and say, they will not allow shops from people from differing cultural backgrounds but they don’t. It is not allowed to discriminate against other cultures, so why is it allowed to discriminate against whacky ideas by some individuals?

David Icke does not promote denial of the Holocaust. He merely thinks that G5 has to do with Corona Virus. The flat earthers are allowed to publish.

Perhaps what people need to do is to hire their own internet servers, which do not rely on major publishers and publish their own stuff by their own servers.

I curently use WordPress but do not need the platform.

I have noticed a big drop in postings on Facebook. It seems to get out of fashion.

Humanity in overdrive

person standing in a museum

Photo by Anastasia Shuraeva on Pexels.com

I still think that most things can be explained by logic rather then maths formulae or therories of any kind. Formulae are merely good to quantify and bring into a presentable format.

The Corona Virus, such as any Pandemic is a result of a human community entering an overdrive situation in which the actual physical bodies involved can no longer cope with the biological results of their own action.

Civilisation is in overdrive and has repetitive mechanisms and variables which are self-defeating. For example financial rules – wrote about that years ago – all they produce are huge debts with some profits for the few top investors, which produced the last great international financial collapse.

Now civilisation has developed superb transport systems and other production methods, which purely produce larger quantities of everything but in that process biological processes have been largely ignored.

As I already blogged for years doctors plainly ignored the source of viral infections.

Just watched Devs, the newest drama on the BBC iPlayer and I am quite disappointed that this merely shows some old-fashioned pixallation techniques and human nightmares, throws it all together.

So that brought me to write the stuff above. Hope it helps.

 

Thinking about Heathrow

Extinction Rebellion is a movement sponsored by Billionnaires and those having gotten rich from the old way of doing business.

Now, come to think of it, Britain being an Island nation, relying on transport and especially so, air travel, Extinction Rebellion pours a lot of energy and money into fighting the expansion of Heathrow Airport, just as Britain has left the EU.

Of course the Paris Climate agreement needs to be properly referenced in thecourt proceedings about a third runway, but the loss of the expansion case is only a temporary stoppage and will be addressed by the appeal that Heathrow Airport plans to do. It’s a matter of changing the wording and show proper reference to the agreement.

Whilst I strongly support the reduction of carbon emissions world-wide, which would include an improvement of air-travel for all countries. Extinction Rebellion spent and continuous to spend an awful lot of energy to concentrate on Britain, doing an extra sacrificial deed and asks us to cut off our almost only viable connection to the outside world.

Of course we do have ships, we do have the Euro tunnel to Paris and Belgium but why ask Britain to be the first to reduce commercial activity.

Of course if Britain cannot have air capacity, they would re-channel air traffic via France but the air travel as a whole will not be reduced.

It is a matter of changing methods of transport and trade world-wide, so that all nations have a fair amount of responsibility.

It seems doubly weird that Keir Starmer, prospective leader for the Labour Party, strongly supports Extinction Rebellion and so does Sadiq Khan. Is it any wonder that Extinction Rebellion now has put up camp in one of London’s most left-wing council’s namely Tower Hamlets and moved into our commutiy centre.

Apparently residents have not been consulted prior to this. Our local area is getting deprived of services and they get replaced by birds, bees flowers and fruit trees; and we hold a totally free, yearly fireworks extravaganca nearby. As if that will pay our council taxes.

I  suppose you can achieve sensible world-wide policies by supporting inventions that develop the new technology we need and not by stopping traffic. Extinction Rebellion put their eggs into the demonstrations basket. How crude.

Their radical actions are designed to actively disturb our economy by stopping traffic, interrupting public transport to weaken our economy but that does not help changing technology.

Moon gravitation

350px-outside_view_of_precession

The earth with rubbish floating around it in space

There is a new moon circling around earth. In fact there are many new moons circling around earth. We sent them up there and they are circling at their own pace and in their own way.

The moon is responsible for the gravitational pull of our planet, makes the tides come in and out and is essentially responsible for high and low waters. Rising waters from sea levels may influence flooding in many areas.

The new permanent, natural moon was probably aquired from a meteor shower and it stayed in the orbit. I am just wondering – as a sheer novice on the subject – whether all these new moons around the earth could influence the gravitational pull.

I am not drawing any conclusions from that, as I have never trained in science, I have only studied business and politics and economics, I’m a bit of a specialist.

 

If it’s a pretty woman

I am extremely concerned to learn about the suicide of a fire brigade officer whilst on duty in the early hours of today in the West Midlands.  In 2019 more police officers died through suicide than in the line of duty. Yet, that story does not even get the fraction of attention that the Caroline Flack story got.

I don’t want to say that one life is worth more than another but I think that the lady suffered from depression is a matter that should have been addressed via her GP or private health service, whichever she prefers.

It seems rather unfair that her prosecution is so overrated and the CPS gets the blame, what about the partner who suffered domestic abuse?

It is more than regrettable that people die needlessly and through their own actions. Generally that problem has to be addressed.

Obviously it is very distressing for a large amount of people if a very popular person commits suicide, that increases stress levels for all of us. But to blame the media for the problems is just completely unfair and unrealistic.

I had some very bad media reports for years and had to put up with it. It happens. Some politicians put up with severe media preasures and survive it. That is a matter of personal strength.

I want to offer sincere condolences to the family and friends of Caroline. I only started to watch Love Island this series and think it must be very stressful to openly deal with very personal and intimate feelings in front of the world and half-naked at most times. Especially as the Islanders don’t have projects to follow other than personal relationships, that must be extremely difficult to cope with.

 

Integrate mobile phone use, don’t ban them

the forbidden fruit syndrom is often a reason why children want excessive access to phones when they are supposed to be sleeping because there is no time during the day to use phones constructively and usefully.

Schools forbid them, then there is home-work and play time and then there is bed-time, which is the only time to catch up on the social networking.

Because children cannot get a useful relationship with their phone for school use, they tend to get driven towards those awful apps that can have a negative effect on them.

At least some schools already integrate tablets with school work but often tablets and phones use the same apps.

Coding is a very important skill and cannot be taught early enough, teaching kids how to create apps can never start early enough. Get them to do it in nursery.

Since a lot of home work and learning material is already online schools should really modernise up very fast to improve the situation.

Children will be much less likely to access their phones secretly and during the night, when they can use them during the day with good purposes, e.g. for school work and in school.

Why push phones into the undesirable category when all adults use them all the time?

architect composition data demonstration

Photo by energepic.com on Pexels.com

 

Bad primal answers

The answer is always the same

  • less unemployment
  • better economy

Yet, the employment never gets compared to what type of jobs those in employment actually do in relation to the carbon footprint that their jobs actually achieve.

planet earth

Photo by Pixabay on Pexels.com

To reduce our carbon foot print we need to change the things we produce and that will take more effort and cost than this government has failed to address.

Prime Minister’s questions has had only one question about reducing carbon foot print and that is about heating systems.

Yet all those answers relating to employment statistics are merely that. Number of people who do some job. That may be

  • producing single use plastic
  • working in coal mines
  • making goods that have a large carbon foot print.

There is absolutely no conscience about changes needed. Those changes may not allow a seamless transition with profit margins not dipping. It may not be possible to continue running the country on private finance only.

Even though Trump yesterday mentioned that he does not want to believe in the doom and gloom and that 3 billion trees worldwide will solve all our problems. But that is more than naive.

These profit oriented leaders only think about the clink and clank of profit in the tills. They make so much money they probably think, if it comes to the worst, they can buy their way out with a rocket to Mars.

That’s the only reason they keep the economy going as it is, so that they can make enough money to invest in space travel because once they ruined this planet, they think they can just move on to another one.

So what the Prime Minister should do at Prime Minister’s Question time, when he answers questions by saying how good employment rates are, he should state how much of those jobs are environmentally friendly.

The Amazon in various ways

What the Amazon rainforest is for the world, Amazon online is for shoppers. Just tried out Amazon fresh and the experience was definitely worth it.

Superb ordering, great logistics and the food is actually fresh and on time and as ordered.

I was very reluctant to even try Amazon fresh and kept on going on the established companies like Asda, Sainsbury’s Tesco and Ocado. But they are old-fashioned and out-dated compared to Amazon.

Must mention that Ocado is good and delivers fresh and on time but it is expensive.

I just love a bargain and the offers on Amazon fresh are unsurpassed and it is actually better value for money than going to a supermarket and get the bargains of the day.

From the selection process, the shopping experience at Amazon online is not much different from going to Lidl but Amazon has at all times a wider variety of products available.

What I love about going to Lidl is that they have some cheap products I love like German Rye bread or bakeware and German sausages but they also sell a mix of products and the food shelves are mixed with the general store shelves, so that I do not have to spend hours trodding through huge areas to find what I am looking for and their products are seasonally appropriate.

That is the big difference in this Lidl concept, that it offers seasonally selected items, whilst in other supermarkets, they store all the stuff all year round – with the exception for Christmas decorations perhaps – and occupy huge amounts of shelf space, and it takes ages to navigate the stores. Large Asda, Tesco or Sainsbury’s stores takes half a day to navigate. But Lidl doesn’t do online orders.

Amazon online offers all that at the touch of a button.

What I find especially ideal with Amazon fresh is that it is sooooooooooo easy to add on to an order and they immediately alert you if you can’t add something on and you can add things on much nearer to the delivery date.

All their goods are sent in paper bags and come without a bag charge and they have wicked special offers on top of all that good service.

Just thought I mention it. I just love it if I do not have to complain that fruit is off – as it sometimes happens with Sainsbury’s deliveries.

I want to mention that I am not sponsored by any company to advertise them, these are genuine personal experiences, which I want to share. I am not dependant on any company agreements.

Human evolution or putting earth first

Humanity has reached an important stage in its evolution and the marker is not whether people are meat-eaters or not it is how they related to the opposite or same gender. But all this has to be related to our environment too.

I think there is a rough split across the board, which can be distinct by the way women (child-bearing ones) are treated by the opposite sex.

The societies, which treat women as child-bearers, home-makers and dependants on the dominant male are distinct from the ones where this male domination is being phased out and in those societies the border between genders is also becoming less distinct.

Of course gender markers come hand in hand with religious beliefs and those soceities most religious also generally have the most distinct policies towards women in that women are not allowed to have their own choices, have to live to please dominant males and be either seen as child bearers or sexual objects.

This policy goes right across religions Muslim, Jew and Christians.

The least variation of female discrimination can be found in Muslim-type societies.

Obviously to me, that many religions have similar threads but where the gods are just claled different names but they all have been established at similar times in history, shows that the creation of those modern religions was a policy that had been developed at that point in time. I think leaders of history were much more coordinated as we are lead to believe.

Back to the point of gender policy. People tend to drift away from classical religion the more scientific understanding they have about the world. Obviously the relgious books, having been written over 2.000 or around 2.000 years ago has an impact on our understanding. We can no longer connect to the logic applied and in fact many bible stories are seen as unlawful these days if they are quoted as a remedy to today’s problems.

We now have civil partnerships instead of marriage, a very important marker of our evolution.

People can change gender if they wish and even parents can refuse to have a gender assigned to those babies born with both genders.

Just imagine we could self-fertilize if we stop to eradicate those humans born with both sex organs. Though I am not certain whether that would not lead to genetic mutilation.

What is certain that if we have any type of life-form that this life form will want to survive in the environment that it can live in.

Yet so many people today do not care about the environment any longer but only for the profit they can make for themselves.

We need to make a stark choice, to either curb those who just want to make profits and stash the cash or whether we want to promote choices that save our planet for us to live on.

Banking on finding another planet are pipe-dreams and very unrealistic. Those solutions are promoted by those who make all that money and rather spend it on looking at other planets or living in space, rather than make less money but save our planet.

To sum up, human evolution has to coincide with a clear choice. Those who simply see women as child-bearing and home-making instruments do nothing towards saving this planet and those who use women to support policies that enable distruction of our current planet help us neither.

People have to decide whatever our civil laws decide is right for our human rights, we need to decide whether we put this planet first.

There is total indecision whether the billionnaires of this world can continue to create huge carbon emissions on earth but are allowed to use all their resources for space exploration. Because that is what’s happening right now.

We’ve had political parties called

the Britain First group was a fascist club. But we do need a political movement that puts earth first. We always see our home as our castle, we need to see the earth as our home.

Earth First was founded in 1979 and I have never heard of them previously as our media does not push them, though there are many branches of that movement throughout the world now. I shall look into this as I have come across that by using pure logic and a thought stream that led me to finding out about them.

 

The cookie saturation

Just mentioned on a blog a couple of days ago that I am currently suffering from Plantar Fasciitis and promptly today, whilst I play a game online, during the advertising break, I get an ad stating that there is an ideal gadget to help me in the mornings. If I only buy this item and put it on in the mornings, my foot problems, due to Plantar Fasciitis, will be much better.

Of course that is a result of cookies and algorithms re-calling matching ads, fed into some database by companies seeking customers, that then are played during my games to me to make me buy this item.

Of course that principle of making people use free market economy solutions would work if people had unlimited amounts of money to buy what somebody produces somewhere and then get it shipped to them.

Would we really still need doctors, a National Health that prescribes established medications to those wanting certified solutions rather than promoted ones?

When I search anything into a search engine, promptly following on from that for several days, I will get inundated with ads about articles relating to that search.

It’s just like that once an interest is shown that then gets thrown back into our faces again and again with the hope that we spend money on that item.

If we would have no other option than to buy what is being offered to us in case of a need, then we would probably end up getting back to woodoo or witch-craft solutions rather than optimised nationally approved medicines.

Where is the quality control and who checks what type of products get advertised to us? Those freedom of market economy gurus would be able to set the standards if they are the only ones having the power to provide solutions.

Probably Human Rights standards is the only mechanism that saves us from those wanting to sell us anything that goes without making sure we have enough money to buy the stuff.

Previous Older Entries

Blog Stats

  • 53,791 hits