Bound to the land

The United Kingdom has and always had the Islander psychology. It affects how a person thinks and feel, how big the landmass is, that they are standing on.

I watched Ed Balls travels to Europe and can see a distinct difference in attitude towards racial and human rights issues. The bigger the landmass the higher is the leaning towards a surpemacy of some kind.

Which one is all dependant on the region.

Whilst Boris Johnson, in his speech this morning, asks for science driven trade deals, he still fails to address distance.  Distance and travel causes huge carbon footprints.

I think the whole dilemma rests on the Islander psychology of the Brits, who live on the Isle of Great Britain, that they think differently towards other land masses and see themselves as something special and as in-betweeners the rest of the world.

Apparently the part where Ed Balls interviews the German Right-wing voters in a German village, reminds of my own village relatives. The German villages do not have any social provision, there is no council housing, no sponsored provision of any kind. In those regions you own a house and pay for what is happening around you. Hence people are feeling left out and feel forgotten. They don’t have immigrants settling there either.

I remember we had to rent a car and travel extensively just to reach the village my relatives live and work in as transport is very difficult or non existent. No wonder that all types of weird ideologies fester.

Britain in contrast is a small country with a huge influx of all sorts of races and ethnicities and they all have to share the ground that is government supported via social provisions throughout.

Britain also has the luck to be well connected to other world-wide nations through the British Commonwealth and that was only possible because the UK is in dire need of international relations to keep the trade going.

Countries with a bigger land-mass like Germany or France lost most of their overseas territories because the psychology of those countries are relying on their bigger landmass and is different.

I don’t think science hasn’t reached to come to those conclusions about how the landmass we live on forms our and influences how we think and feel.

It was the fear of running out of space that brought Britains to conquer other lands, with more or less repressive methods. Yet Britain is most successful in keeping many nations because they are more needy because the main British landspace provided by the United Kingdom is quite small. So Brits are more diplomatic and pleasing towards other cultures.

That’s why Britain has developed in such a powerful international peace maker and setter of standards. Britain needs to spread their wings whilst other bigger nations can just withdraw from international negotiations because they can live largely on their own products.

 

Blog Stats

  • 53,457 hits